<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Make Money Online With Article Marketing Automation (AMA) And Unique Article Wizard (UAW) - Case Study Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/</link>
	<description>Case studies that show whether methods for making money online really work or not.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THEODORE</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-4/#comment-36805</link>
		<dc:creator>THEODORE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-36805</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://medicamentspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;MedicamentSpot.com. Canadian Health&#38;Care.Special Internet Prices.Best quality drugs.No prescription online pharmacy. Online Pharmacy. Order pills online&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy:Maxaman.Propecia.Cialis Professional.VPXL.Viagra.Viagra Professional.Viagra Soft Tabs.Zithromax.Cialis Soft Tabs.Cialis Super Active+.Tramadol.Viagra Super Active+.Super Active ED Pack.Cialis.Soma.Viagra Super Force.Levitra....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
<blockquote><a href="http://medicamentspot.com/" rel="nofollow">MedicamentSpot.com. Canadian Health&amp;Care.Special Internet Prices.Best quality drugs.No prescription online pharmacy. Online Pharmacy. Order pills online</a>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></p>
<p>Buy:Maxaman.Propecia.Cialis Professional.VPXL.Viagra.Viagra Professional.Viagra Soft Tabs.Zithromax.Cialis Soft Tabs.Cialis Super Active+.Tramadol.Viagra Super Active+.Super Active ED Pack.Cialis.Soma.Viagra Super Force.Levitra&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-147</guid>
		<description>awesome :)

i have done something similar apart from this case study where i used AMA/UAW to boost links that linked to my money site.  for three terms one moved from #4 to #2, another from 16 to 8, and the last from 24 to #1 :D

i agree wholeheartedly that boosting pages that link to you is a much easier way to move up the SERPs and will probably do a case study showing just that in the near future ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome <img src='http://www.cubiclecage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
i have done something similar apart from this case study where i used AMA/UAW to boost links that linked to my money site.  for three terms one moved from #4 to #2, another from 16 to 8, and the last from 24 to #1 <img src='http://www.cubiclecage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
i agree wholeheartedly that boosting pages that link to you is a much easier way to move up the SERPs and will probably do a case study showing just that in the near future <img src='http://www.cubiclecage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Quick update here as this ends my experiment....I am going to start using Linkvana to link (very carefully and slowly) directly to my money pages.  Up until now I have only been doing this "secondary linking" stuff. 

Basically it worked great.  I will continue to always use secondary linking because it works.  My main 2 keywords that were sitting at position #21 and #16 in Google, and now they have both moved up, the 21 is now at #12 (with a double listing at 13!) and the 16 is sitting at #14 right now but is bouncing up to #11 as well. 

This is without linking to these pages at all, but only linking to the pages that link to them using Linkvana.  Did one post per day on Linkvana to get these results.

But it is over now because I am going to start ALSO using Linkvana to link directly to these money pages, thus skewing the results......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick update here as this ends my experiment&#8230;.I am going to start using Linkvana to link (very carefully and slowly) directly to my money pages.  Up until now I have only been doing this &#8220;secondary linking&#8221; stuff. </p>
<p>Basically it worked great.  I will continue to always use secondary linking because it works.  My main 2 keywords that were sitting at position #21 and #16 in Google, and now they have both moved up, the 21 is now at #12 (with a double listing at 13!) and the 16 is sitting at #14 right now but is bouncing up to #11 as well. </p>
<p>This is without linking to these pages at all, but only linking to the pages that link to them using Linkvana.  Did one post per day on Linkvana to get these results.</p>
<p>But it is over now because I am going to start ALSO using Linkvana to link directly to these money pages, thus skewing the results&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-135</guid>
		<description>interesting.  this sounds a lot like courts keyword sniping method.  the first half is building a spreadsheet that does damn near this exactly.  and is how i build half of my sites.   the other half, i don't even go to the trouble.  the only sites i think this would be really beneficial for are the potential money sites.  from here on im building farms first, then money sites.  that gives a true signifier of what words can get ranked and how quickly, and actually bring in traffic.

i will have to write a post about building a spreadsheet though (how i have done it).  even though it will be a rehash for most, it will be yet another method for people to mash into their tool box :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting.  this sounds a lot like courts keyword sniping method.  the first half is building a spreadsheet that does damn near this exactly.  and is how i build half of my sites.   the other half, i don&#8217;t even go to the trouble.  the only sites i think this would be really beneficial for are the potential money sites.  from here on im building farms first, then money sites.  that gives a true signifier of what words can get ranked and how quickly, and actually bring in traffic.</p>
<p>i will have to write a post about building a spreadsheet though (how i have done it).  even though it will be a rehash for most, it will be yet another method for people to mash into their tool box <img src='http://www.cubiclecage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I agree that broad match is pretty useless, that was a good point.  

Here are the exact match data for my keywords:

Keyword #1 = 109,000

Keyword #2 = 783,000

Keyword #3 = 296

Keyword #4 = 2.58 million

So I suppose that keyword number 3 is pretty pathetic, but those first 2 are still worth gold to me if I can make page one, I'm sure of it.  In fact, I already make a few bucks per week off Keyword number one just bouncing between page 2 and 3 with it.  Keyword #4 is sort of in the MMO niche and will take another year or two to rank well for I am sure, but that is fine too.

Furthermore, there is a formula that someone posted on the web about how to know which keywords to pursue based on competitiveness and also potential earnings per click.  If you use exact match to measure the competition and get average CPC from Google Adwords tool, you can then figure in the monthly searches and come up with both a competitive ratio for each keyword and a total value ratio that takes all of this into account.  This way you can figure out objectively which keywords are most valuable in how you spend your time building links, as it factors in the competition (how hard it will be to rank for something) but also the profit potential AND the monthly average search volume (how often people are actually searching for your keyword).  

I built an excel file that calculates these ratios to compare my pool of keywords, but I'm not sure I really acted confidently based on the information.  Here is the original formula posting + discussion if anyone is interested:

http://www.webraydian.com/content/view/17/32/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that broad match is pretty useless, that was a good point.  </p>
<p>Here are the exact match data for my keywords:</p>
<p>Keyword #1 = 109,000</p>
<p>Keyword #2 = 783,000</p>
<p>Keyword #3 = 296</p>
<p>Keyword #4 = 2.58 million</p>
<p>So I suppose that keyword number 3 is pretty pathetic, but those first 2 are still worth gold to me if I can make page one, I&#8217;m sure of it.  In fact, I already make a few bucks per week off Keyword number one just bouncing between page 2 and 3 with it.  Keyword #4 is sort of in the MMO niche and will take another year or two to rank well for I am sure, but that is fine too.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there is a formula that someone posted on the web about how to know which keywords to pursue based on competitiveness and also potential earnings per click.  If you use exact match to measure the competition and get average CPC from Google Adwords tool, you can then figure in the monthly searches and come up with both a competitive ratio for each keyword and a total value ratio that takes all of this into account.  This way you can figure out objectively which keywords are most valuable in how you spend your time building links, as it factors in the competition (how hard it will be to rank for something) but also the profit potential AND the monthly average search volume (how often people are actually searching for your keyword).  </p>
<p>I built an excel file that calculates these ratios to compare my pool of keywords, but I&#8217;m not sure I really acted confidently based on the information.  Here is the original formula posting + discussion if anyone is interested:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webraydian.com/content/view/17/32/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webraydian.com/content/view/17/32/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-133</guid>
		<description>how much competition do you have for the exact phrase?  that tends to be the real signifier (for me anyway) of how difficult a word is. there is a site i found (i may still call him out for doing this) who claims he knows his shit because he took #1 for a phrase with like 10 words in it.  the general search shows something like 18 million results.  but the exact search shows 1.  him.  i'd be interested what your exact competition looks like.

i havent updated, but one of the terms on this case study is now #2 :)

i will have to update on monday to verify the solidified rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how much competition do you have for the exact phrase?  that tends to be the real signifier (for me anyway) of how difficult a word is. there is a site i found (i may still call him out for doing this) who claims he knows his shit because he took #1 for a phrase with like 10 words in it.  the general search shows something like 18 million results.  but the exact search shows 1.  him.  i&#8217;d be interested what your exact competition looks like.</p>
<p>i havent updated, but one of the terms on this case study is now #2 <img src='http://www.cubiclecage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
i will have to update on monday to verify the solidified rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-131</guid>
		<description>the traffic really depends on the niche.  this particular niche will not provide LARGE quantities of traffic, however the traffic it does give will be HIGHLY targetted buying traffic.  even with #1 across the board, i don't see breaking 100/day.  though it is possible.  however, with buying traffic you tend to see much higher conversions which make up for the lack in overall traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the traffic really depends on the niche.  this particular niche will not provide LARGE quantities of traffic, however the traffic it does give will be HIGHLY targetted buying traffic.  even with #1 across the board, i don&#8217;t see breaking 100/day.  though it is possible.  however, with buying traffic you tend to see much higher conversions which make up for the lack in overall traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organic SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Organic SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-130</guid>
		<description>I am curious to see how everything turns out with your case study because I too am employing both of these systems and also the Free Traffic System.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious to see how everything turns out with your case study because I too am employing both of these systems and also the Free Traffic System.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-126</guid>
		<description>OK, first update here, I have been testing now for...what, about a week or less?  Got some decent results starting off here.  I have listed the competition level so that you get an idea of how hard it is to make movement in the serps with some of these.  The more results in google, the harder it is to rise up in the serps, generally speaking.

Keyword #1 (Google competition = out of 13.7 million results) I have gone from #21 in the serps to #19.  

Keyword #2 (Google competition = out of 14.5 million results) I have gone from #16 in the serps to #12.

Keyword #3 (Google competition = out of 816,000 results) I have gone from #6 in the serps to #4.

Keyword #4 (Google competition = out of 2.6 million results) I have slipped from #61 down to #63.

There are a few other keywords in the mix there that stayed the same with no movement, and maybe one other that slipped a notch but I did not have the energy to list them all.  

However, bear in mind that keywords #1 and #2 up there are big money keywords for my site and if and when they hit the first page that will make a real impact for me in terms of revenue (I believe).  If I can achieve that then this has been a real success in my opinion.  

All in all, pretty encouraging results for the first week of testing.  I'm going to continue on and will report back here in another week or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, first update here, I have been testing now for&#8230;what, about a week or less?  Got some decent results starting off here.  I have listed the competition level so that you get an idea of how hard it is to make movement in the serps with some of these.  The more results in google, the harder it is to rise up in the serps, generally speaking.</p>
<p>Keyword #1 (Google competition = out of 13.7 million results) I have gone from #21 in the serps to #19.  </p>
<p>Keyword #2 (Google competition = out of 14.5 million results) I have gone from #16 in the serps to #12.</p>
<p>Keyword #3 (Google competition = out of 816,000 results) I have gone from #6 in the serps to #4.</p>
<p>Keyword #4 (Google competition = out of 2.6 million results) I have slipped from #61 down to #63.</p>
<p>There are a few other keywords in the mix there that stayed the same with no movement, and maybe one other that slipped a notch but I did not have the energy to list them all.  </p>
<p>However, bear in mind that keywords #1 and #2 up there are big money keywords for my site and if and when they hit the first page that will make a real impact for me in terms of revenue (I believe).  If I can achieve that then this has been a real success in my opinion.  </p>
<p>All in all, pretty encouraging results for the first week of testing.  I&#8217;m going to continue on and will report back here in another week or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.cubiclecage.com/how-to-make-money-online-with-article-marketing-automation-ama-and-unique-article-wizard-uaw-case-study-results/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubiclecage.com/?p=121#comment-121</guid>
		<description>i will definitely be interested in hearing about your results.  I have been building LV links to my farm sites for my first farm.  it is taking forever as i have a couple dozen in the second tier alone, but i plan on building more money sites in that niche so it should be worth the effort.  thinking about building LV links to all sites that link to my middle sites is enough to make me want to curl up in the fetal position and start wearing adult diapers.  thats a bit much for me :)

it might be worth it just to get the links indexed by running BMD against them.  that way they get counted and a minor juice bump.  i would be much more likely to build LV posts for the quality links (like an in text 3-way exchange).  AMA and UAW built links are so plentiful and usually so low in quality that the time and effort used for building authority into them just doesn't seem like it will be worth it unless it is automated (further leveraging AMA/UAW or BMD).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will definitely be interested in hearing about your results.  I have been building LV links to my farm sites for my first farm.  it is taking forever as i have a couple dozen in the second tier alone, but i plan on building more money sites in that niche so it should be worth the effort.  thinking about building LV links to all sites that link to my middle sites is enough to make me want to curl up in the fetal position and start wearing adult diapers.  thats a bit much for me <img src='http://www.cubiclecage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
it might be worth it just to get the links indexed by running BMD against them.  that way they get counted and a minor juice bump.  i would be much more likely to build LV posts for the quality links (like an in text 3-way exchange).  AMA and UAW built links are so plentiful and usually so low in quality that the time and effort used for building authority into them just doesn&#8217;t seem like it will be worth it unless it is automated (further leveraging AMA/UAW or BMD).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
